Disagree with this. I don't think WFTE is classic LP song structure at all. It's more like I/V/V/C/V/C/B/B2/O which is much different than I/V/C/V/C/B/C/O. In fact WFTE's enhanced song structure being away from their classic is one of the reasons I love it so much.
I see where you're coming from, there is dual rapp going on during the V and the third V, with a guitar occuring in it's lowest C during the V, with a double VV making a W? C + V + B + B (featuring C) = When They Come For Me? EDIT: Purely speculation, LPU guys claim it's I/V/C/V/C/B/O but they specialise more in T-shirts.
I consider The intro music to be the intro "This is not the end this is not the beginning" to be verse 1 "Waiting for the end to come... " to be verse 2 "Flying at the speed of light to be verse" 3 "I know what it takes to move on" to be chorus 1 "Sitting in an empty room" to be verse 4 "I know what it takes to move on" to be chorus 2 "What was left when the fire was gone" to be the bridge "I know what it takes to move on" to be chorus 3 "This is not the end this is not the beginning + Holding on to what I haven't got" to be the outro. So, the way that I look at is is I/V/V2/V3/C/V4/C/B/C/O I don't believe that you have to have a chorus before a new verse starts.
Arguing is not necessarily anything bad. Here. From Wiktionary: From Old French arguer, from Latin arguere ("to declare, show, prove, make clear, reprove, accuse"), probably connected with Ancient Greek ἀργός (argos, "white, bright, etc."); and compare declare (literally "to make clear").
Haha its fun! Personally i think its more similar to Points of Authority's Song structure more than anything else IMO.
Ok, Ree. So happy there more rapping on this record. I've got a feeling this will be my favourite album so far.
Yeah, I'm super excited now after Mike's interview with Complex. I love getting the little descriptions of songs.
Yeah, i think the Complex interview was one of the best interviews LP have have done. It was like the perfect interview.