Figure.09

Discussion in 'Linkin Park Chat' started by ArtistSpongebob8, May 7, 2003.

  1. #1
    ArtistSpongebob8

    ArtistSpongebob8 Active Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2003
    Messages:
    25
    Likes Received:
    0



    Ok, I have been thinking about this since I first heard Figure.09. Does anyone else think LP only picked that name for that song because they already have one called "Part Of Me"?? It's just a thought, but I'd like to hear some other opinions too.
     
  2. #2
    Happy Gilmore

    Happy Gilmore Y2K

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2003
    Messages:
    2,242
    Likes Received:
    9



    I don't know but if they sisn't have a song "Part Of Me" they'd probably call "Figure.09" -> "Part of Me" makes sense :wth:
     
  3. #3
    LinkinJunior

    LinkinJunior LPA Super VIP LPA Super VIP

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2003
    Messages:
    4,790
    Likes Received:
    16



    Yeah, the whole "part of me" title did cross my mind.
     
  4. #4
    Neil

    Neil Super Duper Member LPA Super Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2003
    Messages:
    4,927
    Likes Received:
    8



    me too
     
  5. #5
    Chrissy

    Chrissy Super Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2003
    Messages:
    2,592
    Likes Received:
    22



    heh same with me, although there could have been other reasons why they chose the name as well.
     
  6. #6
    osctotheedge

    osctotheedge Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2003
    Messages:
    338
    Likes Received:
    0



    working titles are better
     
  7. #7
    Steph

    Steph Ambient

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2003
    Messages:
    1,357
    Likes Received:
    12



    I thought that it was cool that "Figure.09" was song number eight ...y'know figure 08
     
  8. #8
    Aurora Girl

    Aurora Girl New Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2003
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0



    (w00t) I know, I thought about the "part of me" part too. If you listen to the lyrics carefully enough, it seems like the song is about pain that "never goes away". A figure 8, as you know (lol) is a shape that keeps going around and around ion an "8" pattern. When the song is called Figure 9, maybe they are trying to relate the endless pain to the figure 9. This is really hard to explain! lol. like if you were running in a figure 8, you would keep going and going., but if you ran in a figure 9 pattern, you would stop because there is a dead end... ;) wow i confused myself. oow my brain hurts lol
     
  9. #9
    ArtistSpongebob8

    ArtistSpongebob8 Active Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2003
    Messages:
    25
    Likes Received:
    0



    I'm glad some of you guys realized this too. Now I don't feel like a complete idiot, haha. I told my boyfriend about it too, and I had him thinking about it for quite a while, haha. Thanks guys ^_^
     
  10. #10
    SketchaMPM

    SketchaMPM Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2003
    Messages:
    127
    Likes Received:
    0



    I removed what I have previously said on account of the fact that I am a complete idiot.
     
  11. #11
    [Darken Hybrid]

    [Darken Hybrid] Ambient

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2003
    Messages:
    1,729
    Likes Received:
    4



    Part of Me and Figure.09 are very similar on the song meanings, yes. It's like Figure.09 is part 2 of Part of Me.
     
  12. #12
    Jawknee

    Jawknee Guest




    Or not.
     
  13. #13
    SoniZero

    SoniZero Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2003
    Messages:
    20
    Likes Received:
    0



    This is my Figure.09 theory:

    Every one has heard of a figure 8...Well LP is obviously making a mockery of this...A figure 8 is perfect and unending...A Figure.09 therefore would be imperfect and ending...This explains why LP has short songs...They end in about 3 minutes, don't run on, and aren't full of useless parts...The songs are imperfect as well (because nothing can
    be perfect)...Brad said in an interview that it isn't good to be a perfectionist because perfection cannot be reached...He said that him and the members of LP realize this and instead strive to be the best that they can be...Although this is very close to perfection it remains imperfect...A figure.09 is as close to perfection that LP can get...Therefore I believe the name Figure.09 is an analogy of sorts that explains LP's musical beliefs...
     
  14. #14
    erasethepain

    erasethepain Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2003
    Messages:
    770
    Likes Received:
    0



    This may sound a little stupid but how do you say Figure.09? Me and my friends say "Figure 9." I was going to ask Mike but I got all shocked and he'd probably be like "...And I thought teenies were bad." j/p.
     
  15. #15
    Bryan

    Bryan Guest




    That has been said so many times now, and its completly false. Figure.09 is a song that never lost it's working title. They didn't name it that as some secret meaning, it's just a working title. If you don't believe me head over to LP.com and go to the Q&A section, Mike says it there.

    J Money: Figure Dot 09
     
  16. #16
    Will

    Will LPA Addicted VIP LPA Addicted VIP

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2002
    Messages:
    35,486
    Likes Received:
    38



    Or not. [/b][/quote]
    Actually he's right.
     
  17. #17
    SoniZero

    SoniZero Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2003
    Messages:
    20
    Likes Received:
    0



    that may be so...but my explanation is a lot more interesting
     
  18. #18
    Bryan

    Bryan Guest




    that may be so...but my explanation is a lot more interesting [/b][/quote]
    But it's wrong, so I don't find it interesting.
     
  19. #19
    SoniZero

    SoniZero Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2003
    Messages:
    20
    Likes Received:
    0



    A lot of other people do...I suppose you think your explanation is interesting?...the fact that it never lost its working title may be true but it is surely not interesting...I'm sticking with my explanation...It's my opinion and I don't appreciate you bashing it
     
  20. #20
    Bryan

    Bryan Guest




    A lot of other people do...I suppose you think your explanation is interesting?...the fact that it never lost its working title may be true but it is surely not interesting...I'm sticking with my explanation...It's my opinion and I don't appreciate you bashing it [/b][/quote]
    It isn't really an explanation what I said. What I stated was a fact. Facts don't have to be interesting, its just the way things are. Mike Shinoda said it was just a working title and they never changed it, therefore thats right.

    So you can stick with your explanation if you want, but it will make you look very un-intelligent seeing as I just showed you where Mike said that.


    Such stubborn people these days.
     

Share This Page