Evanescence's Success & Female Fronted Bands.

Discussion in 'Other Music' started by $pvcxGhxztCasey, Mar 13, 2005.

  1. #1
    $pvcxGhxztCasey

    $pvcxGhxztCasey meanwhile... LPA Addicted VIP

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2003
    Messages:
    15,889
    Likes Received:
    48



    Click Here For Article


    I, personally, believe that Evanescence did open the doors for other female fronted bands to enter the mainstream, but I personally think similiar bands (Within Temptation, Nightwish) are better than Evanescence and do that type of music better than Amy Lee & Co. could ever hope of doing.

    Although, it upsets me that Within Temptation made a rip-off video off Bring Me To Life to get the same popularity, but they're still better than Evanescence, in my opinion. Don't believe me? Go listen to their album, "Mother Earth". Fucking classic album.

    I hate when people group in female fronted bands like Arch Enemy with Evanescence just because they have a female lead singer. You can't compare Angela Gossow to Amy Lee. You just can't.

    What are your opinions? Do you think bands like Lacuna Coil could have broke through to the mainstream if Evanescence never hit it big? Or do you think they play a big role in it?
     
  2. #2
    Luke

    Luke Mind Your Manners. LPA Addicted VIP

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2004
    Messages:
    15,211
    Likes Received:
    245



    I don't think Evanescence opened a door for anyone,if anything they've closed the door a lil' bit cos now female fronted bands will be expected to reach a certain standard now otherwise they'll never have big success,Evanescence (despite bieng one of my favorite bands) just came out of nowhere and went straight to number 1 with Bring Me To Life-something that some female fronted bands can't do for years or at all for that matter
     
  3. #3
    Adam

    Adam !!!! LPA Super Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2003
    Messages:
    7,586
    Likes Received:
    7



    That was an interesting read, but it is debatable wheither or not I think Evanescence opened doors for other female fronted bands, but yes they did bring attention to the scene.
     
  4. #4
    Mark

    Mark Canadian Beauty LPA Administrator

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2002
    Messages:
    24,904
    Likes Received:
    557



    I certainly think Evanescence brought it exposure and made it more mainstream. Obviously other female-fronted bands are going to get more coverage after a huge band like Evanescence.

    What I love is how no record companies have pushed out faux female-fronted rock bands since Evanescence's success.
     
  5. #5
    Ant

    Ant Ambient

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    Messages:
    2,112
    Likes Received:
    0



    No, they've only made it harder for them. Record labels and the mainstream media like similar sounds, but they don't want any band that seems to be an exact rip-off. It doesn't matter if they've been around longer than Evanescence, they'll only get the standard 'We don't want another Evanescence' response when they try to do anything.
     
  6. #6
    Mark

    Mark Canadian Beauty LPA Administrator

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2002
    Messages:
    24,904
    Likes Received:
    557



    Wouldn't you say the record companies are all about capitalizing on the success of others, no matter whether the music sounds alike or not? That seems to be the way things work, as I view it, in the music industry.
     
  7. #7
    User Name

    User Name Angry Marines. Always angry, all the time. >:C LPA Super Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2003
    Messages:
    7,045
    Likes Received:
    14



    Outright lie right there. Evanescence and Lacuna Coil came out at roughly the same time, but Lacuna Coil managed to get onto a larger label faster than Evanescence did. Just thought I'd point that out.
     
  8. #8
    $pvcxGhxztCasey

    $pvcxGhxztCasey meanwhile... LPA Addicted VIP

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2003
    Messages:
    15,889
    Likes Received:
    48



    Maybe, but who found mainstream success faster? Lacuna Coil or Evanescence?
     
  9. #9
    User Name

    User Name Angry Marines. Always angry, all the time. >:C LPA Super Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2003
    Messages:
    7,045
    Likes Received:
    14



    If I answered that, I'd only be repeating myself.
     
  10. #10
    $pvcxGhxztCasey

    $pvcxGhxztCasey meanwhile... LPA Addicted VIP

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2003
    Messages:
    15,889
    Likes Received:
    48



    I don't think Lacuna Coil got mainstream success just because they were signed to a "major" label before Evanescence. Who had the #1 hit and (I think) album?

    Unless I'm totally missing your point. :p
     
  11. #11
    User Name

    User Name Angry Marines. Always angry, all the time. >:C LPA Super Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2003
    Messages:
    7,045
    Likes Received:
    14



    Or maybe we're missing each other's points. :lol:
     
  12. #12
    Mark

    Mark Canadian Beauty LPA Administrator

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2002
    Messages:
    24,904
    Likes Received:
    557



    Major label does not equal mainstream success.
     
  13. #13
    Caitlin

    Caitlin Guest




    Lacuna Coil came around in 2001 with "Unleashed Memories." Evanescence sprang up in 2003 with "Fallen."
     
  14. #14
    Ant

    Ant Ambient

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    Messages:
    2,112
    Likes Received:
    0



    Wouldn't you say the record companies are all about capitalizing on the success of others, no matter whether the music sounds alike or not? That seems to be the way things work, as I view it, in the music industry. [/b][/quote]
    No, not really... I mean, record companies want bands that sound similar, but most of the time they don't want what they'd classify as a "rip-off" of another, highly popular band. Which, unfortunately, is a lot of bands are -- similar to Evanescence in that the only female member is the lead singer.
     
  15. #15
    User Name

    User Name Angry Marines. Always angry, all the time. >:C LPA Super Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2003
    Messages:
    7,045
    Likes Received:
    14



    Lacuna Coil came around in 2001 with "Unleashed Memories." Evanescence sprang up in 2003 with "Fallen." [/b][/quote]
    Evanescence released their first EP sometime around 1998, and Lacuna Coil came out with something as well around that time.
     
  16. #16
    $pvcxGhxztCasey

    $pvcxGhxztCasey meanwhile... LPA Addicted VIP

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2003
    Messages:
    15,889
    Likes Received:
    48



    Lacuna Coil EP - March 31, 1998
    In A Reverie - June 8, 1999
    Halflife - 2000
    Unleashed Memories - March 20, 2001
    Comalies - October 29, 2002


    EDIT: Just for future reference. :whistle:
     
  17. #17
    Omar A

    Omar A Beyond Science LPA Super Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2003
    Messages:
    4,760
    Likes Received:
    14



    Evanescence released their first EP sometime around 1998, and Lacuna Coil came out with something as well around that time. [/b][/quote]
    Also, they released Origin sometimes in 2001 i think
     
  18. #18
    User Name

    User Name Angry Marines. Always angry, all the time. >:C LPA Super Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2003
    Messages:
    7,045
    Likes Received:
    14



    Yeah, it was somewhere around there.
     
  19. #19
    Caitlin

    Caitlin Guest




    Also, they released Origin sometimes in 2001 i think [/b][/quote]
    Ahh. Was Origin an official release, though? I thought I read somewhere from an interview a while back that Amy said it never was..but I could be wrong.
     
  20. #20
    User Name

    User Name Angry Marines. Always angry, all the time. >:C LPA Super Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2003
    Messages:
    7,045
    Likes Received:
    14



    Yes, although I can't remember what label Origin was released on. On an unrelated note, Whisper is single-handedly responsible for getting them onto Wind-Up.
     

Share This Page